https://globalnewsstudy.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

India May Strike Hard at PoK, Occupy Strategic Zones in Retaliation: PM Modi’s 'Identify, Trace, Punish' Doctrine Post-Pahalgam Terror Attack

 India May Strike Hard at PoK, Occupy Strategic Zones in Retaliation: PM Modi’s 'Identify, Trace, Punish' Doctrine Post-Pahalgam Terror Attack


By Vijesh Nair 

Date: April 24, 2025




---


Introduction


In the wake of the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, that claimed the lives of several Indian Army personnel, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has unveiled a high-stakes, no-tolerance counter-terror policy under the banner of “Identify, Trace, Punish.” The announcement marks a turning point in India’s internal security posture and has set in motion speculation of a potential military operation targeting Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK)—not just as a retaliatory strike but as a prelude to potential territorial occupation of key strategic locations.


As tensions flare across the Line of Control (LoC) and national sentiment veers towards decisive retribution, India's leadership appears resolute in signaling that the era of passive diplomacy in the face of terrorism may be over.



---


The Pahalgam Attack: A Brutal Provocation


The ambush in Pahalgam, carried out by heavily armed terrorists, resulted in the deaths of nine Indian soldiers and left multiple personnel critically injured. According to intelligence inputs, the attack was orchestrated by Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives, with support traced to handlers across the LoC.


The well-planned assault, executed during a routine patrol, bore signatures of cross-border coordination and logistical support—echoing a pattern seen in earlier terror strikes such as Pulwama (2019) and Uri (2016). The Ministry of Home Affairs has confirmed that the attackers had high-grade weapons and communication tools, pointing clearly to foreign involvement.



---


PM Modi’s Stern Message: "Identify, Trace, Punish"


Addressing the nation just 24 hours after the attack, PM Modi delivered one of his most assertive national security speeches to date:


> “Let there be no doubt—we will identify the attackers, trace every last one of them and their backers, and punish them with the full might of our forces. There is no sanctuary, no immunity, no escape. The sacrifice of our brave soldiers will not be in vain.”




This action plan—Identify, Trace, Punish—goes beyond immediate tactical response. It signals a broader policy shift with possible long-term strategic consequences, including the re-evaluation of India’s LoC strategy and a potential push toward asserting territorial control in PoK.



---


Speculations of a Cross-Border Operation


Sources within the Ministry of Defence and top military analysts suggest that India may be preparing for an offensive operation inside PoK, similar in scale—but greater in ambition—than the 2016 surgical strikes or the 2019 Balakot airstrikes.


Unlike previous retaliatory measures that focused on "hit-and-return" tactics, this time military planners are reportedly evaluating the possibility of holding strategic positions—especially those known to house terror training camps and arms depots.


Retired Lt. General R. S. Panag told media,


> “India now has the political will and military readiness to go beyond symbolic strikes. Holding ground in PoK, even temporarily, would send an unmistakable message: cross-border terrorism will have territorial consequences.”





---


Security Forces on High Alert


Following PM Modi’s speech, multiple Army divisions along the LoC have been placed on high alert. Satellite surveillance has been intensified, drone sorties have increased, and additional troops have been deployed in forward operating bases.


The Indian Air Force (IAF) has reportedly repositioned fighter squadrons closer to the western sector, while naval intelligence is actively monitoring sea-based infiltration routes. Special Forces units are said to be in operational readiness mode, awaiting further instructions.



---


Strategic Objectives in PoK: Why This Time Could Be Different


India’s potential targeting of PoK would not be just about retaliation. There are clear strategic objectives at play:


1. Dismantling Terror Infrastructure: Terror training camps in regions like Muzaffarabad and Neelum Valley have long functioned with impunity. These areas could now become targets of direct military action.



2. Control of Infiltration Routes: By occupying key ridges and passes along the LoC, Indian forces could disrupt infiltration corridors used by militants to enter Kashmir.



3. Psychological Warfare: Demonstrating control in PoK—even temporarily—would have a profound psychological impact on terror groups and their sponsors.



4. Diplomatic Leverage: A successful military hold in PoK would shift global narratives, particularly if India can present irrefutable proof of terror support from across the border.





---


The Global Angle: How the World Is Watching


India’s expected move is drawing international attention. While the United States has urged both India and Pakistan to “exercise restraint,” key strategic allies like France, Israel, and Australia have expressed solidarity with India’s right to defend itself.


The United Nations Security Council held a closed-door session at the behest of several nations, with India presenting satellite images and intercepts proving foreign hand in the Pahalgam attack.


Even China, which has historically supported Pakistan diplomatically, issued a measured statement, calling for “stability in the region”—a departure from its usual tone.



---


Domestic Support: Nation Rallies Behind Armed Forces


Across India, there is a wave of public support for strong military action. Candlelight marches for the fallen soldiers, trending hashtags like #StrikeBackHard, and calls for justice dominate the public discourse.


Opposition parties have also set aside political differences, issuing statements supporting the armed forces. Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge said,


> “This is a national crisis. We stand with the government in whatever step it takes to ensure justice for our soldiers.”





---


The Pakistan Response: Denial and Warnings


As expected, Pakistan has denied any involvement in the Pahalgam attack. The Pakistani Foreign Office issued a statement claiming:


> “India is making baseless accusations to divert attention from its internal issues in Kashmir.”




At the same time, Pakistani armed forces have been placed on alert. The Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) warned that “any misadventure would be met with full force.”


However, India’s confidence stems from its enhanced operational capability and improved intelligence coordination between the Army, RAW, and IB, making a preemptive response more likely than ever before.



---


Legal and Constitutional Dimensions: Revisiting the PoK Claim


Interestingly, alongside the military discourse, legal experts have reignited debates over India’s constitutional stance on PoK. Article 1 of the Indian Constitution and Parliament’s 1994 resolution clearly state that the entire territory of Jammu and Kashmir, including PoK, is an integral part of India.


BJP leaders have used this context to justify a potential occupation, framing it not as an invasion, but as a “restoration of rightful territory.”



---


Challenges Ahead: Escalation Risks and Geopolitical Fallout


Despite the domestic and strategic rationale, any move to occupy parts of PoK comes with significant risks:


Escalation to Full-Scale War: Pakistan has a nuclear doctrine of “first use,” and any incursion could spiral quickly.


Global Pressure: Prolonged occupation could invite sanctions or censure unless supported by clear evidence and international diplomacy.


Terrorist Blowback: An offensive in PoK could trigger retaliatory terror attacks in major Indian cities.



These challenges, however, may not deter India’s leadership, especially under the current government’s assertive national security doctrine.


There is a great support from local population of india to attack' pakistan 

---


Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Indian Security Doctrine


As India stands on the brink of what could be its most significant military move since the Kargil War, the Pahalgam attack may well become the inflection point that reshapes the nation’s counter-terror policy.


Whether India opts for an immediate, targeted strike or a broader campaign with the intent to hold ground in PoK, one thing is certain: under PM Modi’s “Identify, Trace, Punish” doctrine, India has drawn a red line—terror will not go unanswered, and its backers will no longer be spared.


Stay connected to our blog for exclusive updates, expert opinions, and ground reports as this high-stakes situation continues to unfold.

 

जन्मभूमि विवाद: के सर्वेक्षण की दी इजाजत

मथुरा में लंबित चल रहे कृष्ण म महत्वपूर्ण फैसला सुनाते हुए इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्त जत दे दी है. Read more बाद आया है, जिसमें मस्जिद के परिसर का सर्वेक्ष More information ी प्राचीन मंदिर के अवशेषों पर बनाया गया है.

More information:

मथुरा में ग ै. हिंदू पक्ष का दावा है कि ईदगाह मस्जिद उसी स्थान पर बनी है है जहां कृष्ण का जन्म था था. 17 days ago 17 days ago 17 days ago बनाई ी और यह भूमि पहले से ही उनके कब्जे में थी. More than 1960, more than 1960, more than 1960 विभिन्न है

More information:

इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्त Read more े हित में है. उद्देश्य Share ाय की भावनाओं को आहत करना नहीं है. कोर्ट ने एक एडवोकेट कमिश्नर की नियुक्ति की है, निरीकोर् टकोर्ट को सौंपेगा.

परिणाम फैसले के

हाईकोर्ट के इस फैसले के कई संभावित परिणाम हैं.

  • Read more े में मददगार हो सकती है. यदि सर्वेक्षण में कोउ More information हिंदू पक्ष की स्थिति को मजबूत करेगा. हालांकि ुस्लिम पक्ष के लिए राहत की बात होगी.
  • का भी More. समुदायों के बीच पहले से ावपूर्ण संबंध हॉ सकता है. हालांकि पूर्ण फैसले का सम्मान करें और विवाद को ीके से सुलझाने का प्रयास करें.
  • इस फैसले का अयोध्या में राम जन्मभूमि-बाबरी मस ्जिद विवाद पर भी असर पड़ सकता है. Read more िस तरह के तर्क दिए गए थे. मामले में भी किया जा सकता है.

More:

इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ग जन्मभूमा More. Read more प

"نتنياهو: لا شيء سيوقف الحرب في غزة وضغوط لوقف الأعمال العسكرية تتزايد"

 أعلن رئيس الوزراء الإسرائيلي بنيامين نتنياهو أن "لا شيء سيوقف" الحرب في قطاع غزة، مع تصاعد الضغوط للتوصل إلى وقف لإطلاق النار. وفي ظل استمرار التصعيد العسكري بين إسرائيل وحركة حماس في قطاع غزة، تتفاقم الدعوات لوقف الأعمال القتالية التي أسفرت عن مئات الضحايا ودمار هائل في المنطقة.


وجاءت تصريحات نتنياهو خلال لقاء مع وزراء حكومته، حيث أكد أن إسرائيل ستواصل عملياتها العسكرية في قطاع غزة للدفاع عن نفسها وللحيلولة دون استمرار إطلاق الصواريخ من القطاع باتجاه الأراضي الإسرائيلية.



وفيما يتعلق بجهود التهدئة، فإن المجتمع الدولي يواصل الدعوات لوقف فوري لإطلاق النار وبدء عملية سياسية لإحلال السلام في المنطقة. وعلى الرغم من التزام العديد من الدول والمنظمات الدولية بالوساطة والجهود الدبلوماسية، إلا أن التوترات المستمرة تظل عائقاً أمام التوصل إلى اتفاق ينهي الصراع.


تزايدت الأصوات الداعية لحقوق الإنسان للتدخل السريع لحماية المدنيين في غزة، حيث يواجهون تدهوراً مستمراً في الأوضاع الإنسانية نتيجة القتال المستمر وتدمير البنية التحتية.


من جانبها، تعهدت حركة حماس بمواصلة مقاومتها ودفاعها عن حقوق الشعب الفلسطيني، معبرة عن استعدادها للرد على أي عمل عسكري إسرائيلي والتصدي له.


في هذا السياق، تتواصل الجهود الإنسانية لتقديم المساعدات والإغاثة للمتضررين في غزة، إلا أن تحديات الوصول إلى المناطق المتضررة وتقديم المساعدات تظل عائقاً أمام تلبية الاحتياجات الضرورية.



يأتي هذا الصراع في ظل تصاعد الأزمة الإنسانية والسياسية في المنطقة، مما يتطلب تدخلًا دوليًا فعالًا وجهوداً متواصلة لإيجاد حلول سلمية وإنهاء الصراع الدائر منذ فترة طويلة في الشرق الأوسط.

Pashtun leaders demand 'Azaadi'




19 August 2023

Pashtun leaders call Pakistani leaders 'slaves of army generals', demand 'Azaadi'



Thousands of Pashtuns took to the streets in northwest Pakistan on Saturday, demanding independence from the country and accusing its leaders of being "slaves of army generals".

The protests were held in several cities, including Peshawar, Quetta and Swat, and were organized by the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM), a group that has been campaigning for the rights of Pashtuns, who make up the largest ethnic group in Pakistan.

The PTM has been critical of the Pakistani government's handling of the war against terrorism, and has accused the military of human rights abuses against Pashtuns.

The protests on Saturday were the latest in a series of demonstrations that have been held by the PTM in recent months. In April, the group held a major rally in Islamabad, which drew thousands of people.

The Pakistani government has accused the PTM of being a front for terrorists, but the group has denied these allegations.

In a speech at the rally in Peshawar on Saturday, PTM leader Manzoor Pashteen said that the Pakistani leaders were "slaves of army generals".

"We will not accept slavery," he said. "We will not accept injustice. We will not accept oppression."

Pashteen also called for the release of all political prisoners, including those who have been detained by the military.

The protests on Saturday were largely peaceful, but there were some clashes between protesters and police.

At least one person was killed and several others were injured in the clashes.

The Pakistani government has imposed a curfew in some parts of northwest Pakistan in an attempt to contain the protests.

The PTM has vowed to continue its protests until its demands are met.

The protests have highlighted the growing anger among Pashtuns over the Pakistani government's handling of the war against terrorism and the military's human rights abuses.

The PTM has become a powerful voice for Pashtuns, and its protests have put pressure on the Pakistani government to address their concerns.

The future of the PTM is uncertain, but it is clear that the group has struck a chord with many Pashtuns.

The protests on Saturday were a reminder that the Pashtun question is a major challenge for the Pakistani government.

The government will need to find a way to address the concerns of Pashtuns if it wants to avoid further instability in northwest Pakistan.



Background

The Pashtuns are an ethnic group that makes up the largest ethnic group in Pakistan. They are also the largest ethnic group in Afghanistan.

The Pashtuns have a long history of resistance to foreign rule. They fought against the British in the 19th century and against the Soviets in the 20th century.

In recent years, the Pashtuns have been caught up in the war against terrorism. The Pakistani military has launched a number of military operations in Pashtun-dominated areas, and there have been allegations of human rights abuses by the military.

The PTM was founded in 2018 by a group of Pashtun activists who were protesting against the military's operations in Pashtun-dominated areas. The group has since become a vocal critic of the Pakistani government and the military.




Demands of the PTM

The PTM has made a number of demands, including:

  • The release of all political prisoners, including those who have been detained by the military.
  • An end to the military's operations in Pashtun-dominated areas.
  • The establishment of a truth and reconciliation commission to investigate human rights abuses by the military.
  • The implementation of the National Action Plan, which is a government plan to counter terrorism.
  • The provision of basic amenities, such as education and healthcare, to Pashtun-dominated areas.

Government response

The Pakistani government has accused the PTM of being a front for terrorists. The government has also imposed a curfew in some parts of northwest Pakistan in an attempt to contain the protests.

The government has also offered to hold talks with the PTM, but the group has so far rejected these offers.

The future of the PTM

The future of the PTM is uncertain. The group has become a powerful voice for Pashtuns, but it is unclear how long it will be able to sustain its momentum.

The government will need to find a way to address the concerns of Pashtuns if it wants to avoid further instability in northwest Pakistan.

The Pashtun question

The Pashtun question is a major challenge for the Pakistani government. The Pashtuns are a large and powerful ethnic group, and they have a long history of resistance to foreign rule.

@Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); // Initializes the Bridge this.init(savedInstanceState, new ArrayList>() {{ // Additional plugins you've installed go here // Ex: add(TotallyAwesomePlugin.class); ... add(AllInOneSDK.class); }});

India: A democracy on the rise, Pakistan: An authoritarian state

India: A democracy on the rise, Pakistan: An authoritarian state



PM Modi's Ingratitude:  Erupt at Bilaspur Airport, Pakistan Wastes Money to Host World's Biggest Flag



Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, on July 9, 2023, to inaugurate the newly built Bilaspur Airport, was met with protests by locals. The protesters alleged that the government had not fulfilled its promises of providing employment and development to the region



The protesters also accused the government of wasting money on the construction of the airport, which they said was not required. They demanded that the government instead focus on providing basic amenities to the people of Bilaspur.

The protests in Bilaspur are a sign of democratic right of people,  freedom of expression and accountability of government of India 



Meanwhile, Pakistan has wasted money to host the world's biggest flag. The flag, which is 1,600 feet long and 1,400 feet wide, was hoisted in the city of Rawalpindi on July 11, 2023. The flag is made of 800 kilograms of fabric and is said to have cost 42 crore rupees (about $5 million).

The flag-hoisting ceremony was attended by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. He said that the flag was a symbol of Pakistan's unity and strength.

However, the flag has been met with criticism from some quarters. Critics have said that the money spent on the flag could have been better spent on providing basic amenities to the people of Pakistan.

The flag-hoisting ceremony is seen as a publicity stunt by the Pakistani government. It is an attempt to divert attention from the country's economic woes.

The contrast between the protests in Bilaspur and the flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi is stark. It shows how the two countries are headed in different directions. India is a democracy where the people have the right to protest against the government. Pakistan, on the other hand, is an authoritarian country where the government does not tolerate dissent.



The protests in Bilaspur are a sign of hope for India. They show that the people are still willing to stand up for their rights. The flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi, on the other hand, is a reminder of the authoritarian nature of the Pakistani government.

The two countries are at a crossroads. India is on the path to becoming a developed country, while Pakistan is mired in poverty and instability. The choice is clear: India can choose to continue on its path of progress, or it can follow Pakistan into the abyss.



Analysis

The protests in Bilaspur and the flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi are both symbolic of the different paths that India and Pakistan are taking. India is a democracy where the people have the right to protest against the government. Pakistan, on the other hand, is an authoritarian country where the government does not tolerate dissent.

The protests in Bilaspur show that the people of India are still willing to stand up for their rights. There is freedom of speech in India and Education level of India makes people awareness of there needs . The flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi, on the other hand, is a reminder of the authoritarian nature of the Pakistani government. It is a symbol of the country's poverty and instability.

India and Pakistan have a long and complicated history. The two countries have fought four wars since their independence in 1947. The relationship between the two countries is still tense today.



The protests in Bilaspur and the flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi are just two recent examples of the different paths that India and Pakistan are taking. It remains to be seen whether India will continue on its path of progress, or whether it will follow Pakistan into the abyss.

Conclusion



The protests in Bilaspur and the flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi are both important events. They are symbolic of the different paths that India and Pakistan are taking. India is a democracy where the people have the right to protest against the government. Pakistan, on the other hand, is an authoritarian country where the government does not tolerate dissent.

The protests in Bilaspur show that the people of India are still willing to stand up for their rights. They are a sign of hope for India's future. The flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi on the occasion of money  received by IMF as loan



The protests in Bilaspur and the flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi are both important events. They are symbolic of the different paths that India and Pakistan are taking. India is a democracy where the people have the right to protest against the government. Pakistan, on the other hand, is an authoritarian country where the government does not tolerate dissent.



The protests in Bilaspur show that the people of India are still willing to stand up for their rights. They are a sign of hope for India's future. The flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi, on the other hand, is a reminder of the authoritarian nature of the Pakistani government. It is a symbol of the country's poverty and instability.

The protests in Bilaspur and the flag-hoisting ceremony in Rawalpindi are just two recent examples of the different paths that India and Pakistan are taking. It remains to be seen whether India will continue on its path of progress, or whether it will follow Pakistan into the abyss.



What dodes the future hold for India and Pakistan?


The future of India and Pakistan is uncertain. Both countries face a number of challenges, including poverty, inequality, and terrorism. However, there are also reasons to be hopeful. India has made significant progress in recent years, and Pakistan is showing signs of economic growth.

Here we have to notice that India is focusing on development were as Pakistan has not learned anything from Past

Here are some specific steps that Pakistan Should take as improvement step, In this time of financial emergency Pakistan should not waste the money in such show case of exhibitions to host costlier flag hosting and other ways of wasting money to compare with india on others money ,Instead of this Pakistan Should have focused on Provide better educational Service, Providing basic amenities to people, restore to democracy , maintain law and order , freedom  of Speech and Religion liberty 

Round again to Topic

Here is some more topic to see



Pakistan Wastes Money on Hosting Flag, India Invests in Development


In July 2023, Pakistan hosted the world's biggest flag in Rawalpindi. The flag is 1,600 feet long and 1,400 feet wide, and it is said to have cost 42 crore rupees (about $5 million).



This is a significant amount of money, especially for a country like Pakistan, which is struggling with poverty and economic instability. The money could have been better spent on providing basic necessities to the people, such as food, water, and shelter.


In contrast, India is investing heavily in development. The Indian government has launched a number of initiatives to improve the lives of its citizens, such as the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY), which is a rural road construction program, and the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), which is a financial inclusion program.


The PMGSY has helped to connect rural areas with the rest of the country, while the PMJDY has helped to bring financial services to millions of people who previously did not have access to them.


India is also investing in education and healthcare. The Indian government has increased spending on education and healthcare in recent years, and this has led to improvements in the quality of education and healthcare services available to the people.


The contrast between Pakistan's investment in a symbolic flag and India's investment in development is stark. It shows how the two countries are headed in different directions. Pakistan is wasting money on frivolous projects, while India is investing in its future.


It remains to be seen whether Pakistan will be able to change its course and start investing in development. However, if the country does not change its ways, it is likely to continue to struggle with poverty and economic instability.


On the other hand, India is on the right track. The country is investing in its future, and this is likely to lead to economic growth and prosperity for its people.





India May Strike Hard at PoK, Occupy Strategic Zones in Retaliation: PM Modi’s 'Identify, Trace, Punish' Doctrine Post-Pahalgam Terror Attack

 India May Strike Hard at PoK, Occupy Strategic Zones in Retaliation: PM Modi’s 'Identify, Trace, Punish' Doctrine Post-Pahalgam Ter...